QSA ToolWorks Public Feedback Forum
forum home | register | profile | members |search | faq
homepage | lost password? | chat room

QSA ToolWorks Public Feedback Forum > TCP/IP > The Features We Want to Include You are not logged in. Login or Register.

Pages: 1

Author: Topic: The Features We Want to Include
 Matt
 
 

 Posts: 107
 Registered:
   2003-02-16

  mstrange@mac.com
  
  
Posted: Mar 19, 2003 9:51:41 pm    Profile email Matt Visit

Here is the laundry list of features and issues we want to address in the TCP/IP implementation in Helix. Please comment on any particular items that are of interest to you and you believe need further refinement, or any aspects we have missed.
--
1) Public and Private IP Addresses simultaneously
2) Multiple Clients via one IP Address (DHCP/NAT)
3) Multiple IP Addresses on Server (IP Multihoming)
4) Both Client and Server can be placed behind Firewalls
5) Data Encryption
6) Simultaneous access from mixed OS Clients (Mac OS 8.6 and higher)
7) Client access via Proxy Server
8) Performance equal to or exceeding 5.1's AppleTalk routing over similar network configuration. (As per Wade Brezina's comments
9) Client needs to be able to auto-discover Server's on its local subnet (NSP or Rendezvous?)
10) Client needs to support DNS lookups to locate Server
11) Admin should have an option to hardwire the Client to automatically visit a specific Server
12) Each Client needs to be able to be configured with fixed port numbers so NAT will work. (As per Ryan Wilcox's comments)
13) Data stream compression - particularly with documents - would improve performance. (As per Ryan Wilcox's comments)
14) A Client option to defer transfer of large byte streams - similar to web browser's ability to turn off image loading.

- Edited by Matt on: Apr 24, 2003 11:22:33 pm

Matt Strange
Helix Tech Support
 Ryan Wilcox
 
 

 Posts: 32
 Registered:
   2003-04-17

  
  
  
Posted: May 04, 2003 5:32:22 pm    Profile email Ryan Wilcox Visit

The ability to specify _what_ bytestreams to "turn off' (ala: image loading disabling in web brwosers) would be a good thing.

Say different checkboxes ('load images', 'load subforums'... I can't think of any more objects on the template there)

Another nice option would be "fill in lists as data arrives" vs the current "fill in lists when all data is retrieved"). Don't know how hard the latter would be, but it would be nice (calling up a 1K record list over modems, for example)

Ryan Wilcox
http://www.wilcoxd.com
 lucidlee
 
 

 Posts: 18
 Registered:
   2003-04-09

  
  
  
Posted: May 08, 2003 10:30:05 am    Profile email lucidlee Visit

Appropos Ryan 's suggestion for compressed data streams I think its a no-brainer that encryption should be implemented.

Lee Rydstrand
From whom, all criticisms are constructive - and the jokes above average
Pages: 1

Lost Password?

Powered by
UPB Version : 1.8
A script by PHP Outburst

Page processed in 0.29172 seconds.